User Interfaces - Revision history

Willem-paul at 14:33, 8 June 2009

2009-06-08T14:33:32Z

2009-05-03T17:32:35Z

2009-05-03T15:31:26Z

2009-05-03T15:30:45Z

2009-05-03T15:14:56Z

2009-05-03T15:14:19Z

2009-05-03T15:12:53Z

2009-05-03T15:11:57Z

2009-05-03T15:11:37Z

2009-05-03T15:11:14Z

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 '''Relevant work done in this context'''
 *[[Designing a Multiple patient VRET system]]
 '''Reference'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 3 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Patient side'''		'''Patient side'''

−	A VR system has two sides: the patient and therapist side. For exposure to be effective the system has to raise a level of presence that would expose the patient to the situation he or she fears. To create this level of presence or natural interaction in the virtual world researchers ~~faces~~ several challenges such as moving the patient in the virtual world in a non disruptive manner, rendering objects and figures, appropriate background sound, natural dialogue with avatars, or even rapidly (co-)designing an virtual word by a patient.	+	A VR system has two sides: the patient and therapist side. For exposure to be effective the system has to raise a level of presence that would expose the patient to the situation he or she fears. To create this level of presence or natural interaction in the virtual world, researchers face several challenges such as moving the patient in the virtual world in a non disruptive manner, rendering objects and figures, appropriate background sound, natural dialogue with avatars, or even rapidly (co-)designing an virtual word by a patient.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 3 May 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	'''Relevant work done in this context'''		'''Relevant work done in this context'''
		+	*[[Virtual conversation]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 3 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	'''Patient side'''
		+
		+	A VR system has two sides: the patient and therapist side. For exposure to be effective the system has to raise a level of presence that would expose the patient to the situation he or she fears. To create this level of presence or natural interaction in the virtual world researchers faces several challenges such as moving the patient in the virtual world in a non disruptive manner, rendering objects and figures, appropriate background sound, natural dialogue with avatars, or even rapidly (co-)designing an virtual word by a patient.
		+
		+
		+
		+	'''Relevant work done in this context'''
		+
		+
	'''Therapist side'''		'''Therapist side'''

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 '''Relevant work done in this context'''
-*[Designing a Multiple patient VRET system]
+*[[Designing a Multiple patient VRET system]]
 '''Reference'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 3 May 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Most studies on VR exposure treatment only focus on the patient side, ignoring the therapist side of the system. From their console therapists however need to control the experience of the patient. In a flight simulation, for example, the therapist controls the behaviour of the plane (taxiing, taking off, weather conditions, pilot calls, and turbulence). The therapists’ confidence in controlling the system seems essential for acceptance of these systems, and therefore some research has also focused on the usability of the therapist user interface proposing various design improvements (Gunawan et al., 2004; Schuemie et al., 2002).		Most studies on VR exposure treatment only focus on the patient side, ignoring the therapist side of the system. From their console therapists however need to control the experience of the patient. In a flight simulation, for example, the therapist controls the behaviour of the plane (taxiing, taking off, weather conditions, pilot calls, and turbulence). The therapists’ confidence in controlling the system seems essential for acceptance of these systems, and therefore some research has also focused on the usability of the therapist user interface proposing various design improvements (Gunawan et al., 2004; Schuemie et al., 2002).
		+
		+
		+	'''Relevant work done in this context'''

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Most studies on VR exposure treatment only focus on the patient side, ignoring the therapist side of the system. From their console therapists however need to control the experience of the patient. In a flight simulation, for example, the therapist controls the behaviour of the plane (taxiing, taking off, weather conditions, pilot calls, and turbulence). The therapists’ confidence in controlling the system seems essential for acceptance of these systems, and therefore some research has also focused on the usability of the therapist user interface proposing various design improvements (Gunawan et al., 2004; Schuemie et al., 2002).
 '''Reference'''
 Gunawan, L.T., van der Mast, C., Neerincx, M.A., Emmelkamp, P., and Krijn, M. (2004). Usability of therapist's user interface in virtual reality exposure therapy for fear of flying. In ''Proceedings of the Euromedia 2004'' (Hasselt, Belgium, April 19-21, 2004), pp. 125-132.
 Schuemie, M.J., van der Mast, C.A.P.G., Krijn, M., and Emmelkamp P.M.G. (2002) Exploratory design and evaluation of a user interface for virtual reality exposure therapy. In J.D. Westwood, H.M. Hoffman, R.A. Robb, D. Stredney (Eds.), ''Medicine Meets Virtual Reality'' 02/10, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 468-474.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 3 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	'''Therapist side'''

−	~~'''Therapist side'''~~
	Most studies on VR exposure treatment only focus on the patient side, ignoring the therapist side of the system. From their console therapists however need to control the experience of the patient. In a flight simulation, for example, the therapist controls the behaviour of the plane (taxiing, taking off, weather conditions, pilot calls, and turbulence). The therapists’ confidence in controlling the system seems essential for acceptance of these systems, and therefore some research has also focused on the usability of the therapist user interface proposing various design improvements (Gunawan et al., 2004; Schuemie et al., 2002).		Most studies on VR exposure treatment only focus on the patient side, ignoring the therapist side of the system. From their console therapists however need to control the experience of the patient. In a flight simulation, for example, the therapist controls the behaviour of the plane (taxiing, taking off, weather conditions, pilot calls, and turbulence). The therapists’ confidence in controlling the system seems essential for acceptance of these systems, and therefore some research has also focused on the usability of the therapist user interface proposing various design improvements (Gunawan et al., 2004; Schuemie et al., 2002).